|
NEWS RELEASE
FROM CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ENTERPRISE
13 July 2008
There
was something generated during SA’s electricity crisis after all:
myths
Source:
http://www.cde.org.za
Other
related media releases:
South Africa's
Electricity Crisis How did we get here And how do we put things
right
South Africa’s
recent electricity crisis was not caused by bad luck with
unseasonably cold and wet weather. Nor was it caused by
faster-than-expected economic growth or by the private sector
refusing to invest in electricity generation.
These are just
a few of the myths dispelled by the Centre for Development and
Enterprise’s (CDE) June roundtable on South Africa’s electricity
crisis, which bought together 50 senior people from government,
business and trade unions in an attempt to find answers to the many
questions the crisis generated.
“The
roundtable enabled parties to discuss the crisis in some depth – a
crisis the government knew was coming for 10 years. It’s important
to dismiss popular myths about the causes and provide a clear view
of its real origins,” said Ann Bernstein, CDE executive director.
One important
example of the unhelpful mythology surrounding our electricity
problems is the view that the crisis was caused by the
private sector refusing to invest in electricity generation. The
private sector does not lack interest in power generation. As one
participant pointed out, there are already 40 independent power
producers across Africa, many working in places far more challenging
than South Africa.
Although
experts knew that South Africa was running out of electricity, the
consensus of the round-table participants was that ‘load-shedding’
nevertheless came as a grave shock to most South Africans and –
apparently – also to government. As a result, communication about
the crisis was poor, and the national mood became as confused and
low as it had been at any time since the early 1990s.
Mining,
manufacturing, services and tourism were badly hit and the country’s
international image was seriously damaged, with GDP growth falling
to its lowest rate in more than six years, and business confidence
reaching a 24-year low. All the finger-pointing and
responsibility-shifting surrounding the crisis only amplified the
situation.
“During the
discussions it emerged that poor decisions and miscalculations were
among the most important causes of the crisis,” said Bernstein.
“One of the most crucial of these was the government’s decision in
2001 to prevent Eskom from building any new power stations.”
Another
important concern highlighted was the government’s lack of capacity
to contract public-private partnerships. In a recent tender process
for peaking power generation, the Department of Minerals and Energy
failed after seven years of negotiations to secure a contract with
an international company to build and run a new private power
station. A similar tender in Jordan began later and one of the
bidders keen to assist in South Africa is already producing power
there.
The roundtable
provided a forum for frank and open discussion, which helped
identify some of the steps that need to taken immediately and over
the next few years, as well as several fundamental questions that
remain to be answered.
The most
urgent priority identified by the round table was contracting for
new private sector power stations. As one expert participant
concluded, ‘If
we can get cogeneration and Independent Power Producers contracted
within the next few months, the emergency will recede over the next
two years. If we fail, the blackouts of January 2008 and the ‘load
shedding’ that followed will be just a mild foretaste of what is to
come.’ Without private sector generation, the lights will be going
out for hours every day by 2010, and South Africa can abandon any
hope of reaching its growth targets and development goals.
Longer term
measures suggested by participants include a fundamental leadership
and management shakeup at Eskom, a focus on skills and delivery at
the company, and improved communication from both government and
Eskom. As several participants pointed out, failures of leadership
and management on such a scale should lead to public resignations
and dismissals from Eskom. The board of Eskom needs a radical
shake-up in order to provide the company with the skilled, confident
and independent leadership it requires.
Government
came in for equally direct and far-reaching criticism. As one senior
business leader said, the government has been an ‘incompetent owner’
of a vital national asset. It did not respond effectively to the
plain fact that Eskom’s aging power stations would inevitably start
to wear out. It failed to act on the equally simple reality that an
expanding market for electricity meant that it should invest in more
generating plant. For a decade, it shied away from confronting
uncomfortable facts about the true cost of producing more
electricity. As a result, South Africa has had to endure the worst
of both worlds - ‘load shedding’ immediately followed by very sharp
increases in the price of electricity.
“In the months
and years to come, further economic costs are almost unavoidable,”
concluded Bernstein. “Among the more important negative effects will
be from lost foreign and local investment, lost mineral and
manufacturing exports, lost tourism earnings, further pressure on
the balance of payments from increased liquid fuel imports, and
sharply increased production costs if commerce and light industry
have to rely heavily on their own diesel-fuelled generators.
“We hope the
frank and direct discussion surrounding the causes and consequences
of the crisis will point the way to concrete action to resolve the
electricity shortage with a minimum of permanent damage.”
ENDS
Prepared by:
FD Beachhead Media & Investor Relations
Jennifer Cohen 011 214 2401 / 082 468 6469
Lynne Goulding 011 214 2402 / 072 653 5070
Stuart Meyer 011 214 2408 / 083 618 7260
On behalf of:
Centre for Development and Enterprise
Further info:
Contact Heather Dawson 011 482 5140
|